Nimbu vs Medusa
Commerce without assembling
a CMS.
Medusa gives you commerce primitives and a build list. You add the CMS, the storefront, the multilingual layer, the consent banner, and the servers. Nimbu ships all of that together, in the EU, managed for you.
Medusa is a commerce toolkit. Nimbu is a complete platform.
Medusa gives you the cart, orders, and pricing logic. Everything else a real client site needs, you bring and integrate yourself.
A separate CMS to integrate
Pages, blog, editorial, and custom data all live somewhere else. You pick a headless CMS, define your models there, and write the glue that keeps a product page and its content in sync.
Auth, serverless, and storefront you own
Customer accounts, permissions, and workflow logic run on your infrastructure. The JS storefront is yours to maintain as its framework moves. You carry the update cycle forever.
Multilingual, consent, and infra on your list
Translated products, checkout, and consent are not first-class in Medusa. You source a tool for each, wire it in, and re-audit as things change. Then you run Postgres, Redis, and Node in production.
Nimbu starts from the finished platform. There is nothing to integrate before you begin.
You run Medusa. You do not run Nimbu.
A production Medusa deployment is Postgres, Redis, object storage, and Node processes with monitoring, backups, scaling, and patching. Someone on your team owns that on launch night and every night after. For an agency with ten or fifty client sites, that scales headcount with your portfolio instead of scaling sites without it.
- No Postgres to tune No Redis to babysit, no Node processes to keep alive.
- EU-hosted and Nimbu-operated Your team ships themes and content. The running system is our job.
- Scale sites, not headcount Add client sites without adding a sysadmin per ten sites.
One data model
Content and commerce in the same layer, no connector to maintain.
With Medusa, content lives in a separate CMS. You define models in two places and write the glue that keeps them in sync. In Nimbu, products, pages, and your own structured content all live in Channels with Custom Fields. Adding a field is a field, not a migration and a redeploy.
- Text, select, relation, gallery, geo, calculated, encrypted, localized All Custom Field types available for both content and product data.
- A landing page can reference products A product can carry editorial copy. No boundary between them to connect.
- Headless when you need it The same model serves a headless frontend over the REST API. No separate integration layer.
Medusa vs Nimbu
Where the two platforms differ on the dimensions that decide most agency projects.
| Dimension | Nimbu | Medusa |
|---|---|---|
| Category | EU site + commerce platform, CMS-led | Open-source commerce toolkit |
| CMS / content | Built in, Channels and Custom Fields, same model as commerce | Bring your own, integrate by hand |
| Storefront | Git-based Liquid themes, no build step | You own and maintain a JS frontend |
| Multilingual | Native, translated content and products, 40+ locales, language-aware search | Custom build required |
| GDPR consent | Built in, consent_manager tag, CDN-served script | Not built in, source and wire your own tool |
| Hosting and infra | Nimbu-run EU infrastructure | You run Postgres, Redis, S3, and Node |
| Jurisdiction | Belgian company, EU jurisdiction (APD), EU-hosted data | US-incorporated (Delaware), CLOUD Act reach |
| Server-side logic | Cloud Code in-platform (sandboxed V8, curated modules) | You host and maintain the Node processes |
| Agent operation | nimbu CLI ships as an open skill for 35+ agents | Build your own toolchain on the API first |
| Commerce depth | Variants, pricing schemes, 13-state order machine, gift cards, customer groups | Deep headless, best-in-class commerce primitives |
An answer for your client's legal team, not a conversation about it.
Medusa is incorporated in the United States (Delaware). Any platform incorporated in the US is reachable under the CLOUD Act regardless of server location. For agencies serving healthcare, finance, legal, or public-sector clients, your platform choice becomes your client's compliance posture. Nimbu answers this at the platform level.
Jurisdiction
Belgian company, EU law
Built and run by Zenjoy, regulated by the APD. EU law is the law that applies to your client's data. A downloadable DPA and APD registration back this up.
Consent built in
One tag replaces a third-party CMP
Drop consent_manager into any theme. The consent script is served from Nimbu's CDN. No separate tool to source, wire, and re-audit as frameworks change.
EU-hosted data
Customer data in the EU
Sensitive customer fields encrypted at rest with keys held in the EU. Field-level, part of the Custom Field model. Not a US-incorporated parent under the CLOUD Act.
No overclaims
Precise, not vague
We don't claim ISO or SOC certifications we don't hold. The encryption is field-level on designated sensitive fields. A precise claim you can put in a proposal.
Agent-native operation
Nimbu ships the agent toolchain. With Medusa, you build it first.
Medusa is API-first, so an agent can call it. But to have an agent build and run a real site, you assemble the toolchain: wire the CMS API, the storefront deploy, the infra, and the commerce API into something an agent can drive, then keep that wiring current. The nimbu CLI registers as a skill for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and 35+ other agents. One line to integrate. JSON and TSV output, OS-keychain auth, readonly mode, and command allowlists.
What Medusa does better.
This is genuine, not a courtesy. If these are the things that decide your project, Medusa is likely the better tool, and we would rather you know it now.
Open-source and full code ownership
Medusa is open source. You hold the code, you can read all of it, and you can fork it. Nimbu is a managed platform and you don't get the source. If code ownership is non-negotiable, Medusa is your tool.
Deep headless commerce customization
When you need to reshape the commerce engine itself with custom modules, bespoke order flows, or logic that doesn't fit a standard model, Medusa's architecture is built for exactly that with no vendor in the way.
Self-hosting freedom and zero GMV fees
You choose where and how it runs, with no platform taking a cut of sales. That control is real, and for some teams it is the whole point. If you have the team to run Postgres, Redis, and Node in production and want full control, those are good reasons.
Nimbu trades a measure of that control for completeness and zero infrastructure burden. Whether that is the right trade depends on your clients, not on which tool is better in the abstract.
We were scoping a Medusa build and realised we also needed to pick a CMS, sort out multilingual checkout, wire a consent tool, and figure out where to host everything. Nimbu had all of that already. We shipped the client site instead of assembling the platform under it.
See it on your own client work
Book a 30-minute intro call.
We'll walk Nimbu through the kind of project you'd otherwise assemble on Medusa. If you're moving from an existing build, your data isn't trapped. Products, content, and orders import over the REST API and CLI. We'll help you scope it on the call.
Request received.
We read every request personally and will get back to you to schedule the call.
Book a demo
We reply personally to plan a 30-minute call.
Something went wrong while sending. Please try again in a moment.